Data Center Cooling and Refrigerant Trends: Why AI Is Changing HVAC Design

Compressor & MotorBlog30/09/2026

Share this content. You can share the items you like with your friends.

Aerial view of an AI data center building with rooftop chiller units, representing how AI data centers are reshaping refrigerant strategy

*Copyrights © LG Electronics 2026. All image rights reserved.

The global average PUE for data centers is still hovering around 1.5 (Uptime Institute, 2025). As AI data centers spread, refrigerant has become a critical variable shaping the entire cooling strategy — not just the working fluid inside equipment.

AI Data Centers Are Reshaping Refrigerant Strategy

Data center cooling is no longer just a facilities matter of “lowering the server room temperature.” As AI servers and GPU-based high-density racks proliferate, data center cooling has become an infrastructure strategy that ties together power, thermal management, water use, refrigerant regulation, equipment compatibility, and maintenance risk.

ASHRAE explains that AI data centers demand unprecedented levels of power and cooling, and that the shift from CPU-centric to GPU-centric computing is driving new power densities, thermal loads, and design/commissioning approaches.[S1] This shift has a direct impact on refrigerant as well. Refrigerant is no longer simply the working fluid inside a chiller or CRAC unit — it now determines how efficiently a cooling system moves heat, which compressors it is compatible with, which safety standards it must meet, and whether it carries long-term regulatory risk.

In other words, understanding data center cooling trends today requires looking beyond “air cooling vs. liquid cooling” to the refrigerant and compression cycle operating behind the scenes. Understanding data center cooling in this way requires viewing the refrigerant compressor — the refrigerant and the compressor — as a single system.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Refrigerant is a core variable in data center cooling strategy — it should not be viewed merely as the fluid inside equipment.
  • Regulation (the shift to low-GWP) and refrigerant selection translate directly into equipment, service, and supply risk.
  • Liquid cooling does not eliminate refrigerant — it shifts the refrigerant load into a water loop.
  • Refrigerant selection cannot be separated from compressor selection — they must be evaluated together.

Why Refrigerant Has Become Critical in Data Centers

Data centers are a prime example of energy-intensive facilities. The DOE explains that data centers can use far more energy per unit area than typical commercial offices, and that cooling systems such as HVAC and CRAC units — not just IT equipment — account for a significant share of that consumption.[S2]

Refrigerant matters because the core principle of this cooling system is heat transfer via the refrigerant. In a vapor-compression refrigeration system, refrigerant absorbs heat in the evaporator, is compressed by the compressor, and then releases heat in the condenser. This cycle repeats to move heat out of the data center. Refrigerant therefore plays three roles simultaneously:

●     A medium for cooling performance — the thermodynamic properties of the refrigerant affect the efficiency and operating conditions of chillers, CRACs, heat pumps, and DX systems.

●     A subject of regulatory and environmental risk — HFC refrigerants face phase-down and transition pressure due to their high GWP.[S5]

●     A variable in safety and maintenance — some low-GWP refrigerants require more careful review of flammability, pressure conditions, installation standards, and service procedures. ASHRAE Standard 34 covers refrigerant numbering and safety classification.[S6]

Infographic showing the shift from legacy high-GWP HFC refrigerants to next-generation low-GWP refrigerants (R-32, R-454B, R-1234ze, R-290/propane) and data center cooling architectures including DX/CRAC systems, chillers, CDU-based liquid cooling, and hybrid cooling

*Copyrights © LG Electronics 2026. All image rights reserved.

① Refrigerants are changing — regulation and alternative refrigerants

Trend 1. The Shift from HFCs to Low-GWP Refrigerants

The biggest refrigerant trend in data center cooling is the shift from an HFC-centric structure to low-GWP refrigerants. Under the AIM Act, the U.S. EPA has the authority to phase down HFC production and consumption, restrict HFC use in specific sectors, and encourage the transition to next-generation technologies.[S5]

This shift is not simply an environmental issue. Refrigerant transitions affect equipment selection, long-term service costs, parts availability, refrigerant charge volume, leak management, and the training level of maintenance staff. If you plan to operate existing refrigerant-based chillers over the long term, you should check the following:

●     Is the long-term supply risk for this refrigerant low?

●     Can you transition to a low-GWP refrigerant while maintaining the same cooling capacity?

●     Is it compatible with existing compressors, heat exchangers, oil, and control systems?

●     Are installation standards and maintenance procedures in place to reflect the change in safety classification?

●     Is a compressor retrofit or retrofit kit available, or is full equipment replacement required?

Because data centers demand continuous operation, treating a refrigerant transition as simply “swapping in an eco-friendly refrigerant” is risky. Refrigerant should be viewed as part of the equipment lifecycle and operational risk.

 

Key takeaway — Refrigerant transition is not an environmental issue — it is operational risk management.

Trend 2. Growing Interest in A2L, HFO, and Natural Refrigerants

As the shift to low-GWP refrigerants progresses, interest in A2L, HFO, and natural refrigerants is also growing. A2L refrigerants are classified as mildly flammable and are being discussed as candidates to replace existing high-GWP HFCs, with HFO-based refrigerants and HFO/HFC blends also cited as leading candidates. However, refrigerant should not be selected based on low GWP alone.[S6] In data center cooling, GWP, energy efficiency, equipment compatibility, pressure conditions, refrigerant charge, safety classification, leak detection, serviceability, regional regulation, and long-term supply availability all need to be considered together. For example, when reviewing a refrigerant’s characteristics, it is also worth checking the compressor refrigerant type in tandem.

A common question is whether refrigerants are interchangeable — for instance, "can R-134a replace R-290?" or "can R-600a replace R-290?" The short answer is no without a full system review. Refrigerant interchangeability depends on pressure conditions, compressor oil compatibility, safety classification, and metering-device performance — not GWP alone.

Natural refrigerants can also be considered for some applications, but they are not automatically suitable for every data center. CO2 requires managing high-pressure conditions, ammonia requires toxicity and safety design considerations, and hydrocarbons require flammability management. Refrigerant selection should therefore be judged not by “is the GWP low?” but by “does it fit this data center’s cooling architecture and safe-operating capability?”

Refrigerant Type Comparison Chart — Major Low-GWP Refrigerants for Data Center Cooling

Refrigerant GWP (subject to AR5/AR6 review) ASHRAE 34 Safety Class Notes
R-410A 2,088 A1 (non-flammable) Legacy standard refrigerant, subject to phase-down
R-32 675 A2L (mildly flammable) Used as a transitional replacement in the HVAC sector (data center adoption requires review)
R-454B 465 A2L (mildly flammable) Lower GWP than R-32
R-1234ze 1 A2L (mildly flammable) HFO-based, ultra-low GWP
R-290 (propane) 3.3 A3 (flammable) Natural refrigerant, strict charge limits

Source: ASHRAE Refrigerant Designations/Standard 34 [S6], U.S. EPA Technology Transitions GWP Reference Table [S10]

Role of Refrigerant by Data Center Cooling Architecture

Cooling Architecture

Refrigerant Role

Primary Refrigerant Types

Key Considerations

DX / CRAC systems

Core working fluid of the refrigeration cycle

R-410A → transitioning to R-32 / R-454B

Low-GWP transition, compressor compatibility

Chilled water / Chiller

Working fluid of the chiller refrigeration cycle

R-134a, R-1234ze, R-32, natural refrigerants

Part-load efficiency, chilled-water temperature, GWP regulation

Liquid cooling (CDU-based)

Used indirectly in the facility-side system downstream of the CDU

Water/glycol loop → facility-side refrigerant systems

Can reduce refrigerant use, but does not fully eliminate it

Hybrid cooling

Supports peak load, backup, and auxiliary cooling

Centered on low-GWP and A2L refrigerants

Linked to free cooling, energy optimization

Source: ASHRAE TC 8.1/TC 8.2, LBNL Liquid Cooling Overview [S3][S4]

 

Key takeaway — Low-GWP is not always the right answer — the right refrigerant is the one that fits the architecture and operational capability.

 
Diagram illustrating how liquid cooling shifts refrigerant's role from primary coolant to precision support, and why refrigerant and compressor must be evaluated and designed together in data center systems

*Copyrights © LG Electronics 2026. All image rights reserved.

② Systems are changing — liquid cooling and compressors

Trend 3. Liquid Cooling Is Changing How Refrigerant Is Used

Liquid cooling is a major trend in AI data centers. LBNL explains that liquids have far greater heat capacity than air, making them valuable for reducing the energy consumption of cooling systems.[S3] However, liquid cooling is not a technology that eliminates refrigerant altogether. It captures heat more effectively close to the chip or rack, while the facility-side cooling system still determines where that heat ultimately goes and how it is rejected.

Even in liquid-cooling architectures, heat-rejection paths such as coolant circulation through the CDU, the facility water loop, dry coolers, cooling towers, chillers, heat pumps, economizers, and heat recovery systems may still be needed. In other words, liquid cooling is not a “refrigerant-free structure” — it is closer to a structure in which some of the cooling load that refrigerant used to handle directly is shifted to a water or other liquid loop. As a result, refrigerant use, compressor runtime, and chiller-plant load may decrease, but refrigerant-based equipment can still be required depending on facility conditions. The role of the chiller compressor, therefore, does not disappear entirely even in liquid-cooled environments.

In practice, this facility-side heat-rejection path breaks down into specific configurations such as direct-to-chip (delivering coolant directly to cold plates on the CPU/GPU), immersion cooling (submerging entire servers in a non-conductive liquid), and rear-door heat exchangers (mounting a heat exchanger on the back of the rack to cool exhaust air). Whichever method is used, the heat downstream of the CDU still has to be handed off to a water loop or refrigerant-based equipment, so refrigerant and compressor selection remain relevant questions regardless of the method chosen.

Key takeaway — Liquid cooling does not eliminate refrigerant — it redistributes its role.

Trend 4. Refrigerant Selection Cannot Be Separated from Compressor Selection

Refrigerant must be evaluated together with the compressor. ASHRAE TC 8.1 describes compressor technology as covering the design, performance, operating characteristics, and standards of the various compressors that use refrigerant, while TC 8.2 explains that the compressor, as an essential component of the vapor-compression refrigeration system, circulates refrigerant and creates the pressure differential that enables heat transfer between the evaporator and condenser.[S4]

Changing the refrigerant can also change the compressor’s operating conditions. Pressure ratio, discharge temperature, lubrication conditions, efficiency, part-load performance, and safety standards can all shift. This is why a refrigerant-transition review must always include the compressor and chiller design together. Because a data center’s cooling load varies with AI training, inference, batch jobs, peak hours, and outdoor conditions, how efficiently the refrigerant-compressor combination performs under part-load conditions is especially important. In other words, part-load compressor efficiency — the ability to maintain high efficiency across varying load levels — is one of the most critical performance criteria when evaluating a refrigerant-compressor combination for AI data center applications. In short, refrigerant trends are compressor trends.

Key takeaway — Refrigerant trends are compressor trends.

 

LG compressors support compatibility with low-GWP refrigerants such as R-32, R-454B, and R-290, while delivering the part-load efficiency, low noise, and continuous-operation reliability that data center cooling demands.

If your data center design/operations team is reviewing a refrigerant transition, we recommend evaluating compressor selection and refrigerant compatibility together.

Infographic on data center cooling efficiency (PUE/WUE) and refrigerant management practices including leak detection, maintenance, safety, and reliability for sustained uptime

*Copyrights © LG Electronics 2026. All image rights reserved.

③ Operations are changing — efficiency and maintenance

Trend 5. Refrigerant Also Connects to PUE and WUE

 

What Are PUE and WUE?

Metric

Definition

Ideal Benchmark

PUE (Power Usage Effectiveness)

PUE = Total facility energy / IT equipment energy. A lower value means less energy is wasted on cooling and power infrastructure.

1.0 (ideal) – 1.2 (excellent); global average ~1.54 (Uptime Institute Global Data Center Survey 2025)

WUE (Water Usage Effectiveness)

WUE = Annual water use (L) / IT equipment energy (kWh). A water-efficiency metric for cooling towers and evaporative cooling.

Lower is better; can be improved with direct liquid-cooling architectures

Source: DOE/FEMP Best Practices Guide for Energy-Efficient Data Center Design, Uptime Institute Global Data Center Survey 2025 [S7][S9]

PUE and WUE are commonly used in data center operations. DOE/FEMP describes PUE as total facility energy use divided by IT equipment energy use, and WUE as the relationship between water use and IT equipment energy use.[S7] Refrigerant alone doesn’t determine PUE or WUE, but the efficiency of the chillers, CRACs, heat pumps, and cooling systems that use refrigerant can affect overall cooling energy. In other words, high-efficiency compressor cooling should be viewed as the combined result of refrigerant, compressor, and outdoor-air conditions.

Systems that operate efficiently at lower condensing temperatures, liquid-cooling architectures that use warmer water loops, and regions where free cooling is widely usable can all reduce compressor runtime. Conversely, in hot, humid regions, or environments with high redundancy requirements or low chilled-water temperature requirements, the share of refrigerant-based chiller operation can increase.

For this reason, categorical statements such as “using this refrigerant lowers PUE” should be avoided. A more accurate framing is: “Refrigerant selection should be reviewed together with chiller efficiency, compressor operating conditions, outdoor-air availability, chilled-water temperature, and maintenance strategy, and through this combination it can influence overall cooling-energy efficiency.” When using this kind of language in customer-facing proposals or content, it is advisable to pair it with field-measured data or certified performance data.

Key takeaway — Avoid claiming that refrigerant alone lowers PUE — evaluate it together with the overall architecture.

Trend 6. Why Are Refrigerant Leak and Maintenance Management Becoming More Critical?

As the shift to low-GWP refrigerants progresses, the importance of refrigerant management grows as well. Refrigerant is not confined to the inside of equipment — it must be managed throughout installation, charging, recovery, leak inspection, repair, and disposal. Because data centers are continuous-operation facilities, refrigerant leaks or degraded cooling performance become operational risks, not just environmental issues. Operations teams should review their leak-detection systems, charge and recovery record-keeping, detection/ventilation/shutoff standards suited to the new refrigerant’s safety classification, service-staff competency, refrigerant/parts supply risk, and redundancy in the event of equipment failure.

Undetected refrigerant leaks are among the leading causes of compressor failure in continuous-operation facilities. When a chiller or CRAC compressor stops working, the root cause is rarely the compressor alone — refrigerant charge history, leak records, and system contamination should always be reviewed first. This is why leak-detection systems and regular fault monitoring serve as a first-line defense for operational stability in data centers.

NIST’s research scope covers the energy efficiency of HVAC&R equipment, refrigerant properties, system and component research, and fault detection and diagnostics. This shows that refrigerant transition is not simply a matter of regulatory compliance — it is connected to performance, safety, diagnostics, and maintenance capability.[S8] In this context, compressor efficiency testing and fault-detection capability are what determine operational stability after a refrigerant transition.

Key takeaway — Refrigerant management is data center operational-stability management.

Diagram summarizing a 5-step data center refrigerant strategy: low-GWP transition, liquid cooling, compressor compatibility, PUE/WUE, and maintenance and leak management, with a nighttime data center building

*Copyrights © LG Electronics 2026. All image rights reserved.

Conclusion — Refrigerant Is Moving to the Center of Data Center Cooling Strategy

The core of data center cooling is reliably moving heat out of the facility. As AI servers and high-density racks proliferate, this thermal-management chain becomes more complex. Refrigerant is the key medium in that chain, and the compressor compresses the refrigerant to create the conditions that allow heat to move. Going forward, data center refrigerant trends are likely to move in three directions: a shift from high-GWP HFCs to low-GWP refrigerants; refrigerant selection being evaluated together with compressors, chillers, liquid cooling, heat recovery, and safety codes; and refrigerant becoming part of operational stability, maintenance, energy efficiency, and equipment-lifecycle strategy — not just a target of environmental regulation.

As the 2026 HVAC refrigerant transition accelerates — driven by AIM Act phase-down schedules, the shift to A2L refrigerants, and tightening energy efficiency requirements for AI data centers — the window to proactively evaluate refrigerant-compressor compatibility is narrowing. Data center operators and HVAC designers who address refrigerant strategy now will be better positioned to avoid costly rework and operational disruption later.

Data center operators and HVAC designers should therefore stop viewing refrigerant merely as “the fluid inside the equipment.” Refrigerant is a core variable that connects a data center’s thermal-management strategy, regulatory response, and long-term operational risk.

If you’d like to review a refrigerant transition or compressor selection, we recommend consulting LG Compressor & Motor’s data center and commercial cooling solutions along with the Cross Reference materials to check low-GWP refrigerant compatibility and part-load efficiency together.

References

 

●     ASHRAE, NEMA, PNNL — AI Data Center Energy Performance Framework — AI data center power/cooling demand and the shift to GPUs. [S1] | https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/ai-data-center-framework

●     U.S. DOE, Data Centers and Servers / Cooling Control Systems — energy intensity and cooling’s share of consumption. [S2] | https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/data-centers-and-servers

●     LBNL, Liquid Cooling — the value of liquid cooling and its high heat capacity. [S3] | https://datacenters.lbl.gov/liquid-cooling

●     ASHRAE TC 8.1 / TC 8.2 — the role of compressors and vapor-compression refrigeration systems. [S4]

●     U.S. EPA, AIM Act / HFC phasedown — HFC reduction and refrigerant-transition regulation. [S5] | https://www.epa.gov/climate-hfcs-reduction/technology-transitions-hfc-restrictions-sector

●     ASHRAE Refrigerant Designations / Standard 34 — refrigerant numbering and safety classification. [S6] | https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/standards-and-guidelines/ashrae-refrigerant-designations

●     DOE/FEMP, Best Practices Guide for Energy-Efficient Data Center Design — PUE/WUE and cooling heat paths. [S7] | https://www.energy.gov/femp/articles/best-practices-guide-energy-efficient-data-center-design

●     NIST, HVAC&R Equipment Performance Group — refrigerant properties, efficiency, and fault-detection research. [S8] | https://www.nist.gov/el/energy-and-environment-division-73200/hvacr-equipment-performance-group

●     Uptime Institute, Global Data Center Survey 2025 — industry-average PUE (1.54) and findings on operational stability/standardization. [S9] | https://intelligence.uptimeinstitute.com/resource/uptime-institute-global-data-center-survey-2025

●     U.S. EPA, Technology Transitions GWP Reference Table — GWP figures by refrigerant. Subject to AR5/AR6 review. [S10] | https://www.epa.gov/climate-hfcs-reduction/technology-transitions-gwp-reference-table

 

Note: [S1]–[S9] in the body correspond to the source mapping above; regulatory and statistical figures are based on the latest publicly available version of each source as of the time of writing. Claims involving performance, energy, water, cost, or uptime require separate verification before customer-facing use, and this article does not assert that liquid cooling fully replaces refrigerant/compressors. Publication target: September 2026.

FAQ

Data Center Cooling, Liquid Cooling, and Compressor Technology

Q.

If we adopt liquid cooling, do we no longer need refrigerant?

A.

Not necessarily. Liquid cooling captures heat near the chip or rack. The facility-side system that ultimately rejects or reuses that heat may still require chillers, heat pumps, economizers, dry coolers, and other equipment — some of which use refrigerant.

In other words, even after adopting liquid cooling, refrigerant-based equipment may still be needed depending on how the facility’s cooling system is designed, and refrigerant selection and compressor compatibility remain important considerations. [S3][S4]

Q.

Is a low-GWP refrigerant always the better choice?

A.

No. GWP is an important criterion, but energy efficiency, safety classification, equipment compatibility, pressure conditions, serviceability, charge volume, and regulatory requirements must all be considered together.

Q.

Why is refrigerant transition difficult in data centers?

A.

Data centers require continuous operation and high reliability. A refrigerant transition is tied to equipment compatibility, safety standards, service procedures, leak management, cooling capacity, and redundancy, so it cannot be treated as a simple swap.

 

In particular, transitioning from R-410A to A2L refrigerants (such as R-32 or R-454B) may require changes to leak-detection equipment, ventilation standards, installation qualifications, and service procedures due to their mild-flammability classification.[S5][S6] The Uptime Institute points to gaps in operational stability, maintenance, and standardization as major barriers to adopting liquid cooling and refrigerant transitions.[S9]

 

When a compressor stops working after a refrigerant transition, the issue is often traced back to an incompatible refrigerant-oil combination, improper charge, or a missed step in the commissioning process — not a defective compressor. This is why a structured transition plan, including compressor compatibility verification and technician training, is essential before switching refrigerants in a live data center.

Q.

Does refrigerant selection directly affect PUE?

A.

No single refrigerant determines PUE on its own. But the efficiency and operating conditions of the chillers, CRACs, and heat pumps that use refrigerant can affect cooling energy. Refrigerant should therefore be evaluated together with the overall cooling architecture.

Q.

Can we say in a customer proposal that “low-GWP refrigerant lowers PUE”?

A.

That phrasing is risky. PUE improvement depends on equipment, outdoor-air conditions, chilled-water temperature, control strategy, load patterns, and existing infrastructure. Customer-facing claims require official performance data and field-condition verification.

Q.

Does the compressor itself need to change when switching to a low-GWP refrigerant?

A.

In most cases, yes — the compressor should be evaluated alongside the refrigerant, not after it. LG's compressor lineup, for example, supports compatibility with R-32, R-454B, and R-290, and is designed for the part-load efficiency and low-noise, continuous-duty reliability that data center cooling requires.[S4] Confirming compressor-refrigerant compatibility during the design phase — rather than after equipment is ordered — avoids costly rework later.

Explore Related Article

Explore Related Product